The Triple Crown Requires Greatness

It's fitting that on the same day that the most hyped horse since Fusaichi Pegasus in 2000 marched to a Kentucky Derby victory was the same day that the most hyped boxing match since Mike Tyson versus Evander Holyfield ended up as one of the biggest disappointments in sports' history.
This isn't to say that Floyd Mayweather isn't a great boxer. He is a great boxer. But, he's not one of the greatest boxers. The difference really has to do with the fact that in boxing you make the choice. You can fight a Tyson or Holyfield, or you can fight a man that you tower over who has a bum shoulder and who you should have fought 6 years ago. Can you make a lot of money? Sure, you can. But, can you convince people that you are one of the greats? Absolutely not.

If you think this is a knock against Floyd, it is. But, it's also about how the Triple Crown defines greatness by the fact of what it is. There are other things in sports that define greatness by its mere existence. The Triple Crown in Baseball is one. Winning all 4 major golf tournaments is another as is winning the NASCAR Championship.
What do all of these things have in common? You garner greatness no matter what other decisions are made or what other factors are involved.

That's the Triple Crown. If American Pharoah and Victor Espinoza are able to win the Preakness Stakes next Saturday and then the Belmont Stakes after that, he will be one of the greatest horses of all time.

The Triple Crown requires greatness. In horse racing, there is no such thing as manufacturing it.
ADVERTISEMENT