Winning with Style
(Click on image to enlarge)
Nothing real noteworthy. In both sprints (races under a mile) and routes (races of a mile or greater), the eight-point horses performed better than expected, although, somewhat surprisingly, many of the route types were overbet (witness the negative odds-based impact value, or OBIV).
Interestingly, these results — at least the results in sprints — somewhat mirror those obtained by Quirin 33 years ago, as we find that betting on eight-point speed horses in races featuring no other such animals actually produces a profit.
Personally, I think that’s a load of malarkey — although Hansen was very headstrong (he often is), the fractions of the West Virginia Derby were far from taxing. Still, Hansen’s blue-tail beatdown does highlight why handicappers should carefully assess the pace scenario of the races they choose to play.
In “Winning at the Races,” first published in 1979, author William Quirin attempted to help players do just that via his “speed point” method, which was designed to ferret out the likely frontrunners, pressers and closers in each race.
Quirin assigned 0-8 points to every entrant — eight points to confirmed early runners; zero points to horses that showed absolutely no early lick in their most recent outings. Bloodstock Research Information Services (BRIS) later adapted Quirin’s work and added a style designation to their Premium Plus and Ultimatepast performances.
Borrowed from Tom Brohamer and the Sartin Methodology, the “ESP running styles” are defined as follows:
E (early) – Need-the-lead type that does its best running on the engine.E/P (early presser) – Horse that prefers running on the lead or 1-3 lengths behind the leader.P (presser) – Horse that races in the middle of the pack, 4-7 lengths behind the leader.S (sustainer) – An animal that generally stays well back early and makes one late, prolonged late run.
After the West Virginia Derby, I began to wonder whether these great, but oft-overlooked, tools might be used to identify pace scenarios, as well as the horses most likely to benefit from them. Specifically, I wanted to isolate lone-speed races and races that figured to produce sizzling splits and/or a potential battle for the early lead.
Toward that end, I began my research by looking strictly at horses that earned the maximum Quirin score (eight points). Here’s how they performed (using my database of over 2,000 races from tracks across the country):
 |
| (Click on image to enlarge) |
Nothing real noteworthy. In both sprints (races under a mile) and routes (races of a mile or greater), the eight-point horses performed better than expected, although, somewhat surprisingly, many of the route types were overbet (witness the negative odds-based impact value, or OBIV).
 |
| (Click on image to enlarge) |
With these baseline statistics in mind, I then examined horses that had a clear point advantage, i.e. lone-speed races:
 |
| (Click on image to enlarge) |
* Does not include races with no other rated entrants.
 |
| (Click on image to enlarge) |
Given these encouraging early returns, I was curious to see whether or not a contested pace might lead to the opposite phenomenon — more wins by closers (horses with an “S” ESP style rating).
Of course, first, we need to find out how the “S” horses performed overall:
 |
| (Click on image to enlarge) |
Clearly, these are not steeds one would want to bet on a regular basis, as the IV and OBIV — in both sprints and routes — attest to.
But look at what happens when one looks solely at races featuring exactly two animals with 7-8 Quirin points apiece:
 |
| (Click on image to enlarge) |
Not only do the numbers drastically improve, they turn positive in the win pool in sprints, and are also positive in the place and show pools in routes.
I guess all those snooty fashion designers are right: style really does matter.
ADVERTISEMENT
